This is the eclipse bigfoot saw in Idaho


The Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization took the day off of bigfooting to chase down another elusive creature, the total eclipse of the sun. Check out this awesome footage they got of the event.

Comments

  1. Stuey is looking into the sun trying to find his brain but can't find it.

    MMC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure if Stuey found the exit to his bedroom let alone outside.  But if he did, it would probably look like Trump today.

      Delete
    2. Ha! Stueys bedroom looks like Trump today. Where are you Stuey?

      Delete
    3. If Stuey made his way outside, his bedroom would look like Trump? I don't get it. Anyway, I saw the eclipse yesterday.

      MMC

      Delete
    4. ^Stuey pretending to be MMC again

      Delete
    5. Trump looked directly at the eclipse today with no eye protection and the internet had a good laugh.  It looked like he hadn't seen daylight before.  Reminded me of Stuey.  ;) Sorry for the misfire on humor.

      Delete
    6. Stuey looks at eclipses with no eye protection and his skin turns orange like Trump was way I thought the joke might have been.

      Delete
    7. I hadn't heard Trump looked directly at an eclipse. How did he not go blind?

      Delete
    8. If stuey saw the eclipse he'd be all freaked out. Why is it so dark? Then he'd go inside and turn of the lights. What an idiot.

      Delete
    9. Stueys big fat butt blocked the glare

      Delete
    10. He did, he is under medical examination now.

      Delete
    11. When stuey heard there was going to be an eclipse he thought it meant there was an app that could give haircuts . yes stuey is that dumb

      Delete
    12. Is there a link to Trump being under medical supervision for looking at an eclipse? I can't find anything with a Google news search.

      Delete
    13. ^^^ The first fourteen posts are all from the same nut

      You alright Stuzy?

      Delete
    14. Obsessed with Bigfooters... Seriously weird-sad.

      Delete
    15. ^ I call, she answers.


      Predictable.

      Delete
    16. You've been here for the past 48hours, probably way longer, worrying about "Bigfoot" and people enthusiastic about it. I think that's a little rich, eh Stuart?

      Delete
    17. Not as rich as my name getting mentioned in every post -- what did I do to hurt you so deeply?

      Delete
    18. Most people take the bigfoot myth seriously...

      Oh wait...

      Delete
    19. "Most people" aren't aware that the evidence transcends continents. What did "Bigfoot" ever do to hurt you so deeply?

      Delete
    20. "Most people" aren't aware that the evidence transcends continents because it doesn't.

      Delete
    21. http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf

      Go look for some spelling mistakes, Stuey.

      (Creased)

      Delete
    22. jeff's feet always have a shelf life of until someone wastes their time examining his "evidence".

      Delete
    23. Yes, his research into American hominin footprints has been debunked numerous times...

      Oh wait...

      And you use capitals for the first letters of names. For someone who thinks debunking the work of anthropologists amounts to sourcing grammatical errors... You really don't set a very good example.

      Delete
    24. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    25. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/man-in-ohio-claims-to-have-shot-bigfoot.html?m=0

      Delete
    26. One of Joerg's many problems is that he reads an argument someplace and gets a boner for it and then blindly repeats it without thinking about how it ties in with other arguments he's parroted.

      Case in point: above Joerg demands that I "debunk bigfoot" when he has regularly cited the negative proof fallacy -- no one can prove a negative. You might as well ask me to debunk the existence of one eyed, one horned flying purple people eaters!

      In reality, Joerg doesn't even understand the arguments that he cut and pastes from other sources. If he did, he wouldn't blunder into such stupid mistakes! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    27. If data exists, Stuart, then it is not negative, and it can be tested... Kids stuff really.

      Chop, chop!

      Delete
    28. This Iktomi person seems rather dumb.

      Delete
    29. I didn't just butcher the negative proof fallacy.

      Delete
    30. I've thoroughly debunked every piece of evidence you've cut and pasted here (and that you didn't bother to read yourself), but I can never "debunk bigfoot." How tragically comical is it that you've cited the negative proof fallacy so many times and you don't even understand what it means?? Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    31. Argh yes of course (sigh). Why don't you cut & paste some of your debunking material then? I'm pretty bored here...

      (Yawn)

      Allow me to explain a little more since I'm THAT bored... Data, in this case 60 years worth of track impressions, is not a negative and can be tested.

      (Yawn)

      Delete
    32. Why try capture something that you know isn't real when you can argue on paper that it's real?

      Delete
    33. If something isn't real, it doesn't leave consistent evidence over different continents...

      No expedition to use that evidence = no "Bigfoot" body.

      Delete
    34. Your imaginary creature doesn't leave consistent evidence over different continents... jeff and others are writing what they want you to believe. You think you are an intellectual for going along with what they made up.

      No one is going to waste money on a futile expedition.

      You are perpetually stuck writing about jeff writing about plaster casts taken from fake footprints.

      You can always switch it up and talk about a famous costume or a famous scary story.

      Delete
    35. http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf

      It's all there Stuey. Surely with so many evil "unintellectual" PhD's endorsing so many lies, you'd be able to find a hole in it all somewhere? I keep reading a lot of whining... And not enough substance. Do have this much difficulty convincing people on other sites (dating)?

      Oh... And you need letters for the first letters of names.

      Delete
    36. Your imaginary creature doesn't leave consistent evidence over different continents... jeff and others are writing what they want you to believe. You think you are an intellectual for going along with what they made up.

      No one is going to waste money on a futile expedition.

      You are perpetually stuck writing about jeff writing about plaster casts taken from fake footprints.

      You can always switch it up and talk about a famous costume or a famous scary story.

      Delete
    37. Thanks Joerg, I need "letters for the first letters of names"!!!!!!! Marvelous advice.

      Delete
    38. Oh dear... Do we have an official meltdown?

      You ok Stue?

      Delete
    39. I apologise Stuart... Repeatedly reminding you of kids level grammar, got me all tongue tied.

      Delete
    40. No I'm not okay, I forgot to use a letter for the first letter of a name. I'm not okay at all Oerg -- oops I forgot a letter! Ha ha ha!! Wow. Just wow.

      Delete
    41. Don't be too hard on yourself Stue... A lot of far more qualified people than you can't explain this stuff away. You're in great company.

      Delete






    42. What is your next distraction from a bigfoot body?


      Sykes is coming!









      Delete
    43. There is no distraction Stuart. To find a body, there must be someone with resources looking.

      Delete
    44. And no consortium of any kind thinks making billions of dollars off the exclusive rights of a bigfoot body is worth any investment looking for "bigfoot"....



      ....because they don't believe it to be real.

      Delete
    45. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    46. Whether a consortium or a consorted scientific expedition... No expedition, doesn't mean no Bigfoot body. It just means no expedition.

      (Yawn)

      Delete
    47. yes, iktomi, a consortium can conduct a scientific expedition.

      Wrong, iktomi, no expedition has meant no "bigfoot" body. Where's the body? A blurry video, story, or piece of plaster isn't a body.

      A "bigfoot" body would solve everything. How do you get a bigfoot body?

      Delete
    48. You get a body, by using the existing physical evidence to track the hominin in question, over a sufficient period of time. The cadaver of the most elusive creature on the planet doesn't just turn up... We know from very primitive hominids that the most methodical burial customs have been used.

      Whether a consortium can conduct science, whether the special ops team from Predator wanna rebirth... What ever group of people you can imagine up to find a body, there must be someone with resources looking.

      Simple.

      Delete
    49. Who said a cadaver? Does body only mean cadaver to you? Is your body a cadaver? Do you interpret bodybuilding as cadaverbuilding?

      "the physical structure of a person or an animal, including the bones, flesh, and organs.
      "it's important to keep your body in good condition""

      Bringing back a body can be interpreted as dead or alive. I'm talking about a live body. A body as opposed to a plaster cast..

      "A consortium is an association of two or more individuals, companies, organizations or governments (or any combination of these entities) with the objective of participating in a common activity or pooling their resources for achieving a common goal."

      A consortium would gather money to fund scientists/researchers, etc.... Are you trying to be stupid, iktomi?

      You're confused over my words whose definitions you clearly do not understand and are hung up on.

      Let's try again, you say:

      "What ever group of people you can imagine up to find a body, there must be someone with resources looking."

      Why do you think a consortium(now that you know the definition) hasn't gathered funding for capturing a bigfoot? Surely, there are enough bigfoot believers in the entire world that can raise enough for an expedition?

      Delete
    50. Oh thank you for that Stuart... But yeah, no change sorry buddy. Whether they're bleeving millionaires or not... To find a body, there must be someone with resources looking.

      (Yawn)

      Delete
    51. "To find a body, there must be ***someone with resources looking***."

      Why aren't bigfooters with resources looking, iktomi?

      Delete
    52. (zzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZ)

      Because even the most academic researchers can't give up their day jobs, Stuart.

      Delete
    53. Why aren't bigfooters with resources raising money to generously pay "the most academic researchers" and whoever else is needed to help capture a bigfoot?

      Delete
    54. Shut up bltch stuzy and make Joe a samich

      Delete




    55. iktomi: "Because even the most academic researchers can't give up their day jobs, Stuart."




      Why aren't bigfooters with resources raising money to generously pay "the most academic researchers" and whoever else is needed to help capture a bigfoot?




      Delete
    56. All the millionaires prepared to fund expeditions aren't believers in "Bigfoot"? Oh how upsetting. Still... No expedition = no chance of using the existing evidence to source a Bigfoot body.

      (zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz)

      Delete

    57. iktomi: "Because they have day jobs."



      Why can't money be raised by bigfooters to make their new jobs exclusively capturing a bigfoot full-time? Then they get a share of the billion dollars from exclusive rights to the bigfoot film, images, exhibition, etc....

      There are millions being raised through crowd funding, why not tens of millions for capturing a single bigfoot?


      Delete
    58. That's actually a great idea Stuey! That's something I think I'll be passing around my circles, I won't take credit for it though. I'll be sure to name drop you!

      But yeah... It doesn't really change anything. No expedition to this point = no chance of using the existing evidence to source a Bigfoot body.

      Delete
    59. Surely there are 1,000,000 bigfooters worldwide that can average $20 each and then get a percentage of the "bigfoot" capture profits from films, etc.....

      Will 5 people on par with Meldrum be sufficient to coordinate everything?

      You could have 20 full time hunters/trackers in the hottest "bigfoot" area of your choice with the equipment they need.

      They would stay on the case full time until they get a "bigfoot". Have a yearly drive to raise more money. You'd part with at least $20 because you believe "bigfoot" exists.

      There really is a "bigfoot" so this should be very motivation to carry out and organize. You're really smart, too. It's not above your intellect to organize this, is it?

      Delete
    60. Is your original argument not dawning on you yet, Stuart? I'll allow you another couple of attempts... See if you realise how much you're distancing yourself from it.

      : )

      Delete


    61. No one is crowd funding a bigfoot expedition and never will because they think it a futile money pit?

      Are we back to plaster and scary stories?

      No body ever? A body would shut every critic up and make them look absolutely foolish and you could gloat like no one has ever gloated...but your reality is the exact opposite of that.

      So, plaster and stories it is and plaster and stories it will always be.




      Delete
    62. Ok... Allow me to remind you...

      No "Bigfoot" body has surfaced, because as of yet, there has not been a single expedition to source one. All the hypothetical scenarios you can think of, ideas for future expeditions (cringe), don't have any bearing on your gripe, which was "Bigfoot can't exist, because a body hasn't turned up".

      But hey! I'll be sure to pass around your ideas for furthering research around my circles, Stuey... Some great ideas there.

      (Creased)

      Delete
    63. Oh, and don't be too hard on yourself Stue... A lot of far more qualified people than you can't explain away "plaster and stories".

      You're in great company.

      ; )

      Delete
    64. iktomi: "No "Bigfoot" body has surfaced, because as of yet, there has not been a single expedition to source one."


      "What businessman is gonna spend $5M when to them, a body might not turn up?"

      Plaster casts, costumes, and stories it is and always will be. I know you don't really believe in "bigfoot" and see this as some "intellectual" exercise to declare a mythical creature real in order to somehow make up for your lack of formal education and low status in the work force.

      Remember the good old days, Sykes is Coming!

      Delete
    65. Feel silly now Stue? Remember I told you the other day that you have a knack for doing cartwheels whilst the fundamental point you're trying to defend has past you by?

      "What businessman is gonna spend $5M when to them, a body might not turn up? It's all subjective to the person spending that money I suppose, but for an actual mainstream scientific study, money wouldn't be so much of an issue."

      Like I said Stuart, A lot of far more qualified people, you know those with formal educations & high status, have thus far failed to explain away "plaster casts, costumes, and stories"... Maybe tomorrow, eh?

      (Creased)

      Delete
    66. Argh great... You're back in "debunking mode", you must mean business. Go get em tiger!!!

      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf

      Delete
    67. http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2015/01/passed-past/

      Delete
    68. Great, did you apply that to Meldrum's work and debunk it?

      Delete
    69. ikdummy you r queen of missing the fundamental point. u miss premises. u ought to order of of those plaster casts and blow a transient in exchange for bashing you upside the head with it. No one wastes time om meldrum. YOU are more relevant. Why don't u spend time debunking the loch ness monster or flat earth? bigfoot is my flat earth and u are my object of ridicule.

      Delete
    70. I'm honestly just trying to help you improve your writing skills. Your comments are typically such an incomprehensible jumble of nonsense, that it's difficult to have meaningful dialogue with you. You're welcome!

      Delete
    71. Argh right... So anything at all on "plaster casts, costumes, and stories"? Anything at all??

      Oh... And you need capital letters for names.

      Delete
    72. Maybe you can help me improve on my "Bigfoot" skills? No chasing your tail this time though, eh?

      Delete
    73. What's this? Some kind of video by the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization showing the eclipse? Isn't that Kelly Shaw's group? Well, I've seen about 20 of these already and there's another million of them out there so I'm.....

      Not interested. Done.

      Delete
    74. ... Yeah, it's still utterly humourless. If only you were as focussed on addressing your real issues (Bigfoot evidence) instead of dragging out the single worst efforts at getting credit for catch phrases from strangers... You'd be dangerous.

      Delete
    75. What's this? Some kind of video by the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization showing the eclipse? Isn't that Kelly Shaw's group? Well, I've seen about 20 of these already and there's another million of them out there so I'm.....

      Not interested. Done.

      Delete
    76. I see this Stuey chap is back at it today going on about expeditions.
      what a pathetic life he must lead, the poor sod

      Joe

      Delete
    77. ^ American fop who continually throws in Britishisms to sound like she's British.

      chap, sod....you got two in this time, weasel-d1ck.

      Now wipe off your chin!

      HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHA!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    78. Oh my, you remind me of a villa fan with all your misplaced anger issues . Too bad you wouldn't know what that means . I didn't know backwards hillbillies like you knew any of these so called "Britishisms " I honestly thought you were all about nascar ,guns and moonshine
      Pity

      Joe

      Delete
  2. "Yes, his(jeff) research into American hominin footprints has been debunked numerous times..."

    ^ you agree that jeff has been debunked numerous times. i dont care about your grammar sidetrack.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What's this? Some kind of video by the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization showing the eclipse? Isn't that Kelly Shaw's group? Well, I've seen about 20 of these already and there's another million of them out there so I'm.....

    Not interested. Done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wasn't funny the first three times.

      DON'T FEED THE TROLL KELLY AND STEPHEN!!!!

      Delete
    2. Bugeyes is at it again. All you've ever done is hoax you scum and sell your crappy books from your lair. Try to refute our work rather than being a dismissive puss.

      Delete
    3. A song for Trump xx

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rpq35wyDi7I

      Delete
    4. Kelly Haw runs the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization, which is just him, his kid, his wife, and one friend with an obsession with toy helicopters. His videos on YouTube are among the most ridiculous "field research" activities we've ever seen. Wherever Kelly goes, something gets named after Bigfoot, and Sasquatch "evidence" is found literally EVERYWHERE. In every depression in the ground he sees a track, and he sees Bigfoot activity in every broken branch or pile of sticks. He is the darling of clickbait blog, BIGFOOT EVIDENCE, where he gets free advertisement. He does all of this to get .002 cents per view on YouTube. I guess it's worth it to him. Recently, he's gotten worse. He now sees orbs on trail cameras, and Bigfoot blobsquatches in every shadow.

      Delete
    5. DON'T FEED STUEY!!!!!! YOU'RE BEING TROLLED!!!!!

      Delete
    6. 11:08 is Mr. Peepers. Get a life!

      Delete
    7. Wow 11:08

      Don't cut in on my man action with my Iktomi

      Stuey

      Delete
  4. Gollum trolls BFE and FB 24/7 & then wonders why he cant keep up on his book store killing mold. Don't let jealousy get the better of you Steven. You don't take care of your moldy books you may not get to live in Willow Creek much longer.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story